NewsFront Range

Actions

Colorado man will likely be retried after 1994 murder conviction was vacated following CBI scandal

Michael Clark was released from prison earlier this year after spending more than a decade incarcerated for the murder of Marty Grisham
Michael Clark released from prison after murder conviction thrown out amid Missy Woods investigation
Murder conviction vacated, man released from prison after new DNA evidence differs from original trial
Murder conviction vacated, man released from prison after new DNA evidence differs from original trial
Posted
and last updated

BOULDER COUNTY, Colo. — A Colorado man will likely be retried in a 1994 murder in Boulder months after his release from prison due to a mishandling of DNA evidence connected to the case, a Boulder County judge ruled Thursday.

Michael Clark was released from prison in April after spending more than a decade incarcerated for the murder of Marty Grisham. His conviction was vacated after the Boulder County District Attorney’s Office reviewed what they said was new evidence conducted by an independent lab that produced different DNA results than what was introduced during Clark's trial in 2012.

At the time, the prosecution called former Colorado Bureau of Investigation (CBI) scientist Yvonne “Missy” Woods to testify, which helped prosecutors place Clark at the scene of the crime.

Woods, who had worked for the agency for nearly 30 years before she resigned, was charged in January with 102 felonies for allegedly tampering with DNA evidence in at least 1,003 cases. Those allegations have cost the state millions of dollars, helped create a backlog of evidence examinations and thrown multiple criminal cases into disarray. The case against her is still moving through the courts.

new cbi director first interview investigates.png

Denver7 Investigates

New CBI director seeks to change culture after multiple controversies

Tony Kovaleski

Clarks’ conviction was the first to be vacated in the aftermath of the scandal.

On Thursday, Ken Kupfner, a prosecutor with the Boulder District Attorney’s office, said he believes they can prove without a reasonable doubt Clark was responsible for Grisham’s shooting death.

But Adam Frank, Clark’s attorney, maintained his client’s innocence, telling the judge during the hearing that there would need to be a full week of motions hearings in this case to get ready for the retrial.

He requested a five-day motions hearing take place in February of 2026 to accommodate their DNA expert’s availability and said the date was necessary for some upcoming motions.

When asked by the judge what motions would be filed by the defense, Frank said he would plan on filing a motion to dismiss the case based on “outrageous government conduct.”

After a back and forth, the judge set a Feb. 23 start date for the motions hearing, and a tentative date for the retrial to begin on May 11, 2026.

Clark's attorney later provided the following written statement to Denver7:

“Michael Clark did not kill Marty Grisham. In 1994, the Boulder Police Department did not find evidence that Michael Clark killed Marty Grisham. They did not find evidence that Michael Clark killed Marty Grisham because Michael Clark did not kill Marty Grisham.

“The reason the Boulder County DA prosecuted Michael Clark in 2012 was because Missy Woods made the false claim that Mr. Clark’s DNA was at the scene of Mr. Grisham’s murder. Obviously, if that had been true, it would be an extremely damning piece of evidence. But let me be clear: Missy Woods’ testimony implicating Mr. Clark was false. The prosecution’s chosen lab re-tested the original evidence with improved modern technology and did not find Mr. Clark’s DNA. Missy Woods’ false testimony that Mr. Clark’s DNA was at the murder scene caused an innocent man to be convicted and wrongfully sentenced to life in prison.

“Now, in what appears from the outside to be an attempt to protect Ms. Woods and CBI from that damning conclusion, Michael Dougherty is prosecuting an innocent man for murder 30 years after the incident based on the same evidence his office had in 1994 when they concluded they should not charge Mr. Clark. Putting aside the morals of that choice, it is deeply unfair. Evidence that helps demonstrate Mr. Clark’s innocence has been lost to the sands of time. We will show this at future court dates.

“It is a tragedy that Mr. Clark and his family will have to go through this process, but that is outside their control. All we can do is confront the prosecution’s case in court.”


Denver7 is committed to making a difference in our community by standing up for what's right, listening, lending a helping hand and following through on promises. See that work in action, in the videos above.